Skip to content

New version#167

Merged
RAprogramm merged 9 commits intomainfrom
new_version
Oct 5, 2025
Merged

New version#167
RAprogramm merged 9 commits intomainfrom
new_version

Conversation

@RAprogramm
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

RAprogramm and others added 3 commits October 5, 2025 09:26
Adds ResultExt::context(msg) as ergonomic alternative to .ctx().
This matches anyhow's API while maintaining masterror's features.

Usage:
  read_file().context("Failed to read config")?

Equivalent to ctx but simpler for common cases where you just
need a message without custom kind/metadata.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Shows GDPR-compliant field redaction with Hash/Redact policies.
Demonstrates per-field privacy controls for sensitive data.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Added documentation for:
- .context() method (anyhow-style ergonomics)
- .downcast_ref() for error introspection
- Examples directory with comprehensive demos
- Zero-friction migration from anyhow
Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting

@RAprogramm RAprogramm merged commit 11da6b4 into main Oct 5, 2025
5 checks passed
@RAprogramm RAprogramm deleted the new_version branch October 5, 2025 04:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant